The greatest unsolved mystery of our Eleven Generations genealogy research has been proving that Anna Elizabeth Hawk (b. 1767), wife of George Hawk (b. 1760), was, in fact, a Walthour by birth. The Walthours were a well documented family in both Pennsylvania and Georgia. Their property in Brush Creek was the site of a famous fort built to defend the new settlers against Indian attacks.
Anna Elizabeth Hawk lived beyond the 1850 Census, which would indicate she was over 80 year old. After bearing 12 children from 1788 (her eldest, Michael Hawk) through 1811, it's no wonder where we derived our fertility. You'd expect a woman who lived that long and supplied the forebears of half the population of the Eastern United States would have a better record of her lineage. Sadly, no.
In our earliest stages of discovering the Hawk history, virtually every "Family Tree" on Ancestry and other sources posted that Anna Elizabeth was the daughter of Stephol (Stophal, Stoph) Walthour and Dorothy (Dolly) Lenhart. This claim was completely unsupported by any documentation: birth records, baptismal records, marriage records, family lore, property records, etc. Some records about Dolly Lenhart show her in the same age bracket as George Hawk; hence, making her too young to be the mother of a child born in 1767. Lineage of Stoph Walthour is nonexistent.
The most reliable source for all things Hawk was the excellent book, "Early German Hawk Families of Westmoreland County, PA" by our cousin and WWII hero, Kenneth Hawk Slaker. In Slaker's book, he writes that Anna Elizabeth (who went by Elizabeth or Liz), was a Walthour; but, he fails to show how. As much as we respect Slaker's research, we were unwilling to take his word for it.
A wild goose chase ensued. We traveled to Western Pennsylvania and spent time in various cemeteries and the historical society digging into books about the Walthours and Hawks. We paid researchers to find birth and marriage records. We found ample material on the most notable of Walthours, as well as Conrad, Hans, and George Hawk, and Michael Hawk and his children, including his youngest, namesake Michael, who served in the Civil War and was a prisoner at Andersonville; nevertheless, we found nothing about Stoph Walthour.
We speculated that maybe Liz was an orphan by the time she married George Hawk. Her parents (or at least her father) may have died of disease or Indian attack, which was certainly common. The baptismal records, which were a rich source of finding connections among family members, show no Walthours sponsoring any of George and Elizabeth's children - which was strange, since if the Walthours were family, at least one of them would be present at their grandchild/nephew/niece's baptism.
Instead, one family became intertwined with the George Hawk family from early on: The Walter Family. Since "Walthour, Waldhauer, and Walter" were likely the same name once Anglicized, maybe Elizabeth was actually a WALTER. There was a plethora of evidence to support this theory: first, the matriarch of the Walter family was named Anna Elizabeth (nee Volick). She married George Hawk's father, Conrad, in 1789. Based on the census records, her sons followed the Hawks from eastern PA to Westmoreland County and fought with George Hawk in the same militia lead by Christopher Truby. Anna Elizabeth Walter's late husband left a will that was posted on Ancestry, and mentions a daughter, Anna Elizabeth.
We know from previous history that the Hawk men married their neighbors and cousins, so the idea that Anna Elizabeth married into the Hawk family is very reasonable. Her mother didn't marry Conrad until after Michael was born, so it wasn't as if she was George's step-sister yet. The Walters appear in several census records, in the baptismal records, and in documented histories of the family. Why not surmise that Anna Elizabeth Hawk II was, in fact, a Walter by birth?
That's my theory and I'm sticking to it!
The Endless Debate over Anna Elizabeth Walthour
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Posted by loretta at 6/11/2016"Celebrity" Ancestors & Cousins
Monday, April 9, 2012
Posted by loretta at 4/09/2012While I have not yet found us closely related to any current celebrities you would recognize (although the odds are good, considering the size of our family), we have a few notable ancestors who were famous in their time:
Wallace Stevens - Pulitzer prize winning poet and insurance professional. We share a common ancestor, our 9th great-grandparents on our father's side, Jacques James Sellaire (Zeller) and Clothilde de Valois (who was famous in her own right). More on the Zellers in a future entry.
George DeBinder - personal physician of the Marquis de Lafayette, and served with Lafayette in the American Revolution. His son, Joseph DeBinder married the native American (Mohawk), Mary Bill. Their daughter, Ann, was Mary Dempsey Monaghan's mother.
Joseph Wambaugh - author of many true-crime and fictional crime books; his family and ours share the Wambaugh paternal grandfather, Louis "Napoleon" Wambaugh/Wambach who arrived in America in 1848 or thereabouts.
The Goodyears (originally Gutjar) - by marriage in the Buzard/Buzzard family.
Speculated but unconfirmed: The House of Valois - through as yet unsubstantiated claim by the Zeller family, though they are still quite enthusastic about it after 300 years!
Daughters (and Sons) of the American Revolution Links
Sunday, April 8, 2012
Posted by loretta at 4/08/2012
After several months of research and cross-referencing, it appears that we have at least four legitimate links to the American Revolution, which would enable anyone in our family to become official Daughters/Sons of the American Revolution, if we so chose to join that organization. I'm not sure if this topic comes up in cocktail-party conversation, but it may make for amusing trivia at your next family reunion.
There is an entire generation of Hawk/Keppel/Yerian/Buzzard and Snyder men who were age eligible to participate in the Revolution. Of those men, I have determined the following ancestors that have a listing in the DAR records with the details of their claim:
Our 6th Great-Grandfather:
----------------------------------------------------
Our 5th Great-Grandfather:
There is an entire generation of Hawk/Keppel/Yerian/Buzzard and Snyder men who were age eligible to participate in the Revolution. Of those men, I have determined the following ancestors that have a listing in the DAR records with the details of their claim:
Our 6th Great-Grandfather:
YEARIAN, GEORGE
Ancestor #: A118164
Service:
PENNSYLVANIA Rank: CIVIL SERVICE
Birth:
(ANTE) 1739 PENNSYLVANIA
Death:
(ANTE) 11-20-1804 MT. PLEASANT TWP WESTMORELAND CO PENNSYLVANIA
Service Source:
WESTMORELAND CO.,PA, 1781-1793 MINUTE BOOK A, P 1; OLD WESTMORELAND, NOV 1980, VOL 1, NO 2, P 17
Service Description:
1) SUPERVISOR OF ROADS 1781-2.
2) ALSO SUPERVISOR 1781-2.
2) ALSO SUPERVISOR 1781-2.
----------------------------------------------------
Our 5th Great-Grandfather:
HAWKS, GEORGE
Ancestor #: A053577
Service:
PENNSYLVANIA Rank: PRIVATE
Birth: 9- -1760 NORTHAMPTON CO PENNSYLVANIA
Death: (ANTE) 3-31-1836 ALLEGHENY TWP WESTMORELAND CO PENNSYLVANIA
Service Source: PA ARCH, 3RD SER, VOL 23, PP 221, 222, 320; 5TH SER, VOL 3, PP 631, 648, 649, 650; 6TH SER, VOL 2, P 351
Service Description:
1) CAPT GEORGE BUSH, NEW 11TH BATTALION
2) RANGER, CAPT TRUBY
2) RANGER, CAPT TRUBY
-----------------------------------------
Our 6th Great-Grandfather:
BOSSART, JOHN (later spelled BUZZARD or BUZARD)
------------------------------------
Ancestor #: A012355
Service:
PENNSYLVANIA Rank: PRIVATE
Birth:
(ANTE) 1725 CUMBERLAND CO PENNSYLVANIA
Death:
3- -1803 NEAR CHAMBERSBURG PENNSYLVANIA
Service Description:
1) CAPT.SAMUEL PATTON,COL.SAMUEL CULBERRSON
2) 4TH BATT. MILITIA.
2) 4TH BATT. MILITIA.
1) County: CUMBERLAND CO. - State: PENNSYLVANIA
SPOUSE:
1) CATHERINE LA RUE
------------------------------------
Our 6th Great-Grandfather (originally spelled COPPLE then KEPPEL):
KEPPLE, NICHOLAS
Ancestor #: A065107
Service:
PENNSYLVANIA Rank: PATRIOTIC SERVICE
Birth:
2-4-1724 HERBITZHEIM FRANCE
Death:
1804 WESTMORELAND CO PENNSYLVANIA
Service Source:
BUSCHE, REP OF THE COMM TO LOCATE THE SITE OF THE FRONTIER FORTS OF PA, 1896, VOL 2, P 373
Service Description:
1) OWNER OF THE KEPPLE BLOCKHOUSE, HANNASTOWN, WESTMORELAND CO
------------------------------------------
This relationship is not proven, but is very possible based on geography, names of sons, and other sources:
Our 5th Great-Grandfather:
Ancestor #: A133455
Service:
PENNSYLVANIA Rank: PRIVATE
Birth:
(CIRCA) 1758 NORTHAMPTON CO PENNSYLVANIA
Death:
(POST) 1813 HEMPFIELD WESTMORELAND CO PENNSYLVANIA
Service Source:
PA ARCH 5TH SER, VOL 8, P 516
Service Description:
1) CAPT ADAM DIEHL,8TH CO 4TH CLASS MA
2) SAGLER,COL GEIGER,6TH BATT
2) SAGLER,COL GEIGER,6TH BATT
------------------------------------------
The Stanford Boys
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Posted by loretta at 1/10/2012
I will spare the readers too many details of the process of how I uncovered many of our ancestors and their stories, but suffice it to say, I duplicated many errors of other hack genealogists by linking to the wrong families, accepting others' work without verification (never again!), and jumping to wrong conclusions. Nonetheless, the more I delved into the process, the smarter I became.Serious genealogy requires being a natural sleuth, solving puzzles, noticing inconsistencies and anomalies. It requires more patience with niggling details than with my fellow human beings, like a good homicide detective.
It wasn't enough for me to simply find the right ancestors and post them in a tree - I wanted to know why our forefathers/mothers immigrated to America, why they lived where they lived, how they met their spouses, and who were those strange children living in their house? I wanted to know if they owned slaves, what they did for a living, how many acres they owned, and whether they served in the military. I wanted to know if they lived long lives, how many of ther children survived, and a little about their circumstances in the 1700s, 1800s and early 20th century. I guess I was just ridiculously curious - more curious, sadly, than most of our predecessor cousins, since most of the Cook and Smith family didn't even exist on any family trees on Ancestry.com until I tracked them down.
The Hawk family gave us a smorgasbord of interesting stories.
It wasn't enough for me to simply find the right ancestors and post them in a tree - I wanted to know why our forefathers/mothers immigrated to America, why they lived where they lived, how they met their spouses, and who were those strange children living in their house? I wanted to know if they owned slaves, what they did for a living, how many acres they owned, and whether they served in the military. I wanted to know if they lived long lives, how many of ther children survived, and a little about their circumstances in the 1700s, 1800s and early 20th century. I guess I was just ridiculously curious - more curious, sadly, than most of our predecessor cousins, since most of the Cook and Smith family didn't even exist on any family trees on Ancestry.com until I tracked them down.
The Hawk family gave us a smorgasbord of interesting stories.
Introducing the Hawk Family
Sunday, January 8, 2012
Posted by loretta at 1/08/2012
It's time to introduce the most interesting family in our tree, the Hawk family. Its patriarch, Hans Jerg HAG arrived in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1748 aboard the ship "Hampshire" at age 41 with his son(s) and his wife, Anna Caterina Hanselman. He was probably known as "George" since the German tradition was to go by your middle name. Jerg/George Hag was well documented by his many, many descendants, so we were lucky to be related to such a prominent pioneer of Pennsylvania!
Hans Jerg HAG's son, Conrad Haack (later to be spelled HAWK) b. 1741, was somewhat famous in his day, and several books and articles about Westmoreland County, the early churches of Brush Creek, the early settlements of Pennsylvania, and several Hawk family histories document his life in detail. Nevertheless, the many spellings of Hawk - including Hag, Haag, Haack, Hauk, Hack, Hawks, and other variations, along with the highly common German names of Jurg, George, and Conrad, created some confusion among the families. There was a nearly identical Hawk family in Maryland and a second Conrad Hawk in Pennsylvania with similar dates. It was important to connect the dates and geography to make sure we were following the right Hawks when it came to finding the census records, church records, etc..
I first hit upon our Hawk family when I discovered a website dedicated to the Hawk family tree, and one called "Find a Grave." Because of the accuracy of the Hawk family site and the work our Hawk cousins provided listing pictures and locations of many of our Hawk relatives' graves, I was able to find an ancestor born in the USA as early as 1733. Later, we would find ancestors in the USA as early as 1630, but we'll get to those folks later.
From all accounts, our earliest ancestor from this line is George Yerian (Anglicized from the German name, "Irion") who was born in Northampton County, PA in 1733. His father, Mathias Irion, arrived in 1732 as a Palatinate refugee escaping religious persecution. The story goes that Mathias was a "redemptioner" - an immigrant who paid for his passage to America through several years of indentured servitude. Mathias married Mary Magdalena Pfister, whose family ultimately came to Pennsylvania as well.
Hans Jerg HAG's son, Conrad Haack (later to be spelled HAWK) b. 1741, was somewhat famous in his day, and several books and articles about Westmoreland County, the early churches of Brush Creek, the early settlements of Pennsylvania, and several Hawk family histories document his life in detail. Nevertheless, the many spellings of Hawk - including Hag, Haag, Haack, Hauk, Hack, Hawks, and other variations, along with the highly common German names of Jurg, George, and Conrad, created some confusion among the families. There was a nearly identical Hawk family in Maryland and a second Conrad Hawk in Pennsylvania with similar dates. It was important to connect the dates and geography to make sure we were following the right Hawks when it came to finding the census records, church records, etc..
I first hit upon our Hawk family when I discovered a website dedicated to the Hawk family tree, and one called "Find a Grave." Because of the accuracy of the Hawk family site and the work our Hawk cousins provided listing pictures and locations of many of our Hawk relatives' graves, I was able to find an ancestor born in the USA as early as 1733. Later, we would find ancestors in the USA as early as 1630, but we'll get to those folks later.
From "Find a Grave" I found Lydia Mable Hawk, Grandpa's mother, who married Henry John Dillemuth in 1901 in Oil City, PA. Lydia's father was David Keppel Hawk, whose father was Daniel Hawk, whose father was Michael Hawk, whose father was George Hawk, whose father was Conrad Hawk, whose father was Hans Jurg Hag. There is absolutely no doubt about this, as we have volumes of documentation to satisfy even the most fastidious genealogist.
From all accounts, our earliest ancestor from this line is George Yerian (Anglicized from the German name, "Irion") who was born in Northampton County, PA in 1733. His father, Mathias Irion, arrived in 1732 as a Palatinate refugee escaping religious persecution. The story goes that Mathias was a "redemptioner" - an immigrant who paid for his passage to America through several years of indentured servitude. Mathias married Mary Magdalena Pfister, whose family ultimately came to Pennsylvania as well.
The Terrible 1920s
Posted by loretta at 1/08/2012
In the decade of 1920, at least ten important people died in the Cook family as well as Mary Theresa Dempsey Monaghan, wife of Marcus Gage Monaghan, who had outlived seven of her children and her husband, and had raised her grandsons, Don and Frank Ranney when her daughter, Mary Bernadette, died of tuberculosis in 1911 at age 30.
In 1920, James Cohen, second husband of Mamie Cook's mother, Frances Neathammer, died at age 57. Frances' first husband, Charles Noonan, had died before 1900, and we find Frances living in Cleveland in the 1900 census, having moved up from Niles, Ohio, with two teen-aged daughters, Sadie and Annie. We are not certain when exactly Charles Noonan died, or how, but he must have been very young, since he would only have been 36 in 1890 and he disappears before 1900.
The move to Cleveland by Frances Noonan at least explains how Mamie met Bernard Cook, since she grew up in Niles, at least 50 miles south of Cleveland. We are not sure how Mamie met Bernard, but we can speculate that her father, Charles, visited the saloon operated by J.J. Cook and Mamie could have been sent by her mother to fetch him. There may be a more innocent explanation, of course.
In 1920, James Cohen, second husband of Mamie Cook's mother, Frances Neathammer, died at age 57. Frances' first husband, Charles Noonan, had died before 1900, and we find Frances living in Cleveland in the 1900 census, having moved up from Niles, Ohio, with two teen-aged daughters, Sadie and Annie. We are not certain when exactly Charles Noonan died, or how, but he must have been very young, since he would only have been 36 in 1890 and he disappears before 1900.
The move to Cleveland by Frances Noonan at least explains how Mamie met Bernard Cook, since she grew up in Niles, at least 50 miles south of Cleveland. We are not sure how Mamie met Bernard, but we can speculate that her father, Charles, visited the saloon operated by J.J. Cook and Mamie could have been sent by her mother to fetch him. There may be a more innocent explanation, of course.
How Regina was the Key - Part II
Posted by loretta at 1/08/2012
Once you think you have identified an ancestor, you can't be satisfied you are correct until you have undergone a sort of scientific method of attempting to *disprove* your hypothesis. Without absolute proof of someone's identity, you are making many assumptions that can be wrong! Therefore, when I thought I had identified the perfect Smith family living in Maryland but having hailed from Pennsylvania, with the right "Catherine" born the right year, I had to make sure she was really our Katie. The best way to disprove a woman is an ancestor is to find her either married to someone else, or alive or dead at the wrong time.
If the Catherine Smith born to George and Elizabeth and living in Taneytown, MD in 1870 was our Katie, she should not show up in 1880 in Maryland married to someone else! However, while searching for the mother, Elizabeth Smith's maiden name, I found her daughter, Catherine married to a man named Dorsey, who happened to be relatively well-documented. I therefore had to eliminate that wonderful Smith family from contention, after hours of researching them. Heck, I practically knew the names of their pets by the time I realized my mistake. I had to bid a fond farewell to the wrong Smiths. Auf wiedersehen!
If the Catherine Smith born to George and Elizabeth and living in Taneytown, MD in 1870 was our Katie, she should not show up in 1880 in Maryland married to someone else! However, while searching for the mother, Elizabeth Smith's maiden name, I found her daughter, Catherine married to a man named Dorsey, who happened to be relatively well-documented. I therefore had to eliminate that wonderful Smith family from contention, after hours of researching them. Heck, I practically knew the names of their pets by the time I realized my mistake. I had to bid a fond farewell to the wrong Smiths. Auf wiedersehen!
How Regina was the Key to Identfying the Smith Family - Part I
Posted by loretta at 1/08/2012
In previous entries I introduced you to Regina Smith, youngest daughter of Charles and Eva Smith, youngest sister of Katie Cook, who was counted in two censuses in 1900. She lived with the Cooks and the Evers for almost 30 years as a maiden aunt/housekeeper/seamstress.
Regina was a cipher, really. She had no husband, no children, no job outside domestic duties to her niece and sister (which was surely voluntary). She left her home and family in PA at age 30 to live in Cleveland with a sister with whom she did not grow up, and a niece whose husband and she were the same age!
We know Katie Smith had left home before Regina was even born in 1870. We find Katie in the Sprigg household in Maryland, and we don't find Regina at all. Regina does not exist in the 1870 census, even though she was born June 2 of that year. We learned later that children born after June 1st are not counted in that year's census. If she had been born one day earlier, I would have saved hours of searching! Fortunately she does appear in the 1880 census with her family in Somerset County, PA listed as "Virginia M. Smith" when her name is actually Regina G. Smith. Fun, fun, fun with the idiotic census-takers. (Oh, you have no idea.) Regina Smith appears in censuses as Virginia M. in 1880, Ragina L. in 1900, Raeina in 1910, and finally, correctly as Regina in 1920. Never mind that her age is listed differently in every census.
These are the kinds of challenges you face in genealogy, and you have to be a bit of a masochist to bother with it at all.
Regina was a cipher, really. She had no husband, no children, no job outside domestic duties to her niece and sister (which was surely voluntary). She left her home and family in PA at age 30 to live in Cleveland with a sister with whom she did not grow up, and a niece whose husband and she were the same age!
We know Katie Smith had left home before Regina was even born in 1870. We find Katie in the Sprigg household in Maryland, and we don't find Regina at all. Regina does not exist in the 1870 census, even though she was born June 2 of that year. We learned later that children born after June 1st are not counted in that year's census. If she had been born one day earlier, I would have saved hours of searching! Fortunately she does appear in the 1880 census with her family in Somerset County, PA listed as "Virginia M. Smith" when her name is actually Regina G. Smith. Fun, fun, fun with the idiotic census-takers. (Oh, you have no idea.) Regina Smith appears in censuses as Virginia M. in 1880, Ragina L. in 1900, Raeina in 1910, and finally, correctly as Regina in 1920. Never mind that her age is listed differently in every census.
These are the kinds of challenges you face in genealogy, and you have to be a bit of a masochist to bother with it at all.
The Smith - Wambaugh Family
Saturday, January 7, 2012
Posted by loretta at 1/07/2012
After much searching, following many red herrings, and barking up the wrong family trees, I finally determined Katie (Catherine E.) Smith Cook's parents were Charles Francis Smith and Mary Eva (called Eva) Thekla Wambach/Wambaugh, from Somerset County, PA, which is just north of the Maryland border. Charles Smith was born in Bavaria in 1824 and was most likely Schmidt when in Germany. (That name is not much easier to research.) Charles Smith had a large orchard on land that he purchased from his father-in-law, Louis "Napoleon" Wambach/Wambaugh. Charles and Eva Smith had 12 children from 1848-1873. Here is an excerpt from the book "The History of Early Settlers of Allegheny Township":
Eva died six years after her youngest child Marcellus (Mars) was born. I found a cemetery record from St. John’s in New Baltimore PA., and her headstone says she died June 30, 1879. Eva Wambaugh Smith was only 48 when she died, and with 12 kids, no electricity, no indoor plumbing, and no servants, that's no surprise. Within a year, Charles Smith remarried a widow, Elizabeth Reed Baldwin, who had also been the second wife of a widower, Benjamin Baldwin. She not only raised Benjamin’s children when he died, but two of her own, plus four or five of Charles’ children. We kindly refer to her as Second Hand Liz.
Charles F. Smith, a native of Germany, born in 1823, came to America at the age of sixteen, and commenced work in Bedford County, near Mann's Choice. He afterward purchased of his father-in-law, Lewis Wambaugh, the farm in Allegheny Township on which he now resides. Mr. Smith has the best orchards in Somerset County; indeed they will compare favorably with any in this section of the state. He raises all kinds of fruit in great quantities, and ships to local markets as well as to Altoona and other points. Twenty-two years ago, his farm of one hundred and fifty acres, of which eighty are cleared, was a dense forest. Mr. Smith, by industry and careful management, has today one of the finest and most productive farms in this section.
The Cook Kids & The Mysterious Regina Smith
Posted by loretta at 1/07/2012
Joe and Katie Cook sort of alphabetized their children's names, but not quite; we have Anna, Albert, Bernard, Bertha, Charles, Delbert, Elroy, Louisa and....Sebastian. Where Uncle Bass's name came from, who knows? Louisa was named after her paternal grandmother, and there was a Sylvester in the Wambaugh family (Katie Smith's mother's maiden name was Wambaugh, but more on that later). In 1916, Katie's youngest brother, Mars (Marcellus Janora Smith) b. 1873 who was close in age to his nephews Bernard and Sebastian named his youngest son Bernard Sebastian Smith.
These are just some of the trivial but amusing things you learn while researching your genealogy!
These are just some of the trivial but amusing things you learn while researching your genealogy!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)